| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator and handling dropped columns |
| Date: | 2009-02-12 18:41:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1234464085.9467.73.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 13:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Right, that's what I meant --- do all the work within pg_dump.
>
> > Is this acceptable to everyone? We could name the option
> > -u/--upgrade-compatible.
>
> If the switch is specifically for pg_upgrade support (enabling this as
> well as any other hacks we find necessary), which seems like a good
> idea, then don't chew up a short option letter for it. There should be
> a long form only. And probably not even list it in the user
> documentation.
Why wouldn't we want to list it?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-12 18:42:11 | Re: GIN fast insert |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-12 18:39:06 | Re: pg_migrator and handling dropped columns |