| From: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de |
| Cc: | "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM" <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, "L(dot) pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Compressed TOAST data corruption with REPACK CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2026-04-26 07:12:36 |
| Message-ID: | 12262.1777187556@localhost |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > > ok, this is a patch to enhance the tests. It also simplifies
> > > gen_compressible() a bit and adjusts it so it is (hopefully) more reliable in
> > > generating compressible values. Now it can be used to reproduce the fix [1].
> > >
> > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52301.1776440752%40localhost
> >
> > Thanks, I think it looks good, but unfortunately I don't see any problems
> > when running this test without your fix (I was assuming that the test would
> > fail). I didn't immediately understand why. Do you see any failures?
>
> The enhanced tests should reproduce it (please let me know if they dont):
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/44015.1776685220%40localhost
I see you actually refer to the correct tests. I see no failure now as
well. I'll try to make the tests more stable. Sorry for the confusion.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-04-26 07:21:14 | Re: Property graph: fix error handling when dropping non-existent label property |
| Previous Message | Greg Burd | 2026-04-25 20:08:02 | [PATCH] Batched clock sweep to reduce cross-socket atomic contention |