| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
| Date: | 2008-09-09 12:21:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1220962874.3913.461.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:42 +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
> How about multiple standby servers?
There are various ways for getting things to work with multiple servers.
I hope we can make this work with just a single standby before we try to
make it work on more. There are various options for synchronous and
asynchronous relay that will burden us if we try to consider all of that
in the remaining 7 weeks we have. So yes please, just not yet.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-09 12:22:14 | Re: Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-09 12:17:25 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |