Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait?
Date: 2008-09-08 16:16:31
Message-ID: 1220890591.3913.190.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> So thinking we should test XLogArchiveCheckDone() for both
> >> stopxlogfilename and history file and then stat for the stop WAL file:
>
> > This seems better.
>
> Somehow I missed the 5-Apr patch that introduced this bogosity.
> Next time you make a fundamental change in the behavior of a function,
> how about updating its comment to match?

It felt OK when I did it, because of the clearly named boolean. But I
accept your point and will look to improve my code comments in future.

> After studying it for a minute, I think that XLogArchiveCheckDone no
> longer even has a clearly explainable purpose; it needs to be split
> into two functions with two different behaviors. I plan to revert
> XLogArchiveCheckDone to its previous behavior and introduce
> XLogArchiveIsBusy (flipping the sense of the result) to use in
> pg_stop_backup.

You sound like you're in the middle of doing this yourself. Or would you
like me to do that?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-09-08 16:33:26 Re: Fast REVERSE() function?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-09-08 16:10:25 Re: Fast REVERSE() function?