Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date: 2011-02-15 22:01:25
Message-ID: 12064.1297807285@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Do we want to add such a query in the docs to help pgfoundry authors to
> write their own 'from unpackaged' scripts?

[ scratches head ... ] Why is your version generating so many
unnecessary @extschema@ uses?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-15 22:46:09 Re: XMin Hot Standby Feedback patch
Previous Message Thom Brown 2011-02-15 21:58:20 Re: NULLs in array_cat vs array || array