| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Sketch of a fix for that truncation data corruption issue |
| Date: | 2023-04-03 12:40:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1199755.1680525641@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Has this problem been fixed? I was under the impression that it had
> been, but I spent some 20 minutes now looking for code, commits, or
> patches in the archives, and I can't find anything relevant. Maybe it
> was fixed in some different way that's not so obviously connected?
As far as I can see from a quick look at the code, nothing has been
done that would alleviate this problem: smgrtruncate still calls
DropRelationBuffers before truncating.
Have you run into a new case of it? I don't recall having seen
many field complaints about this since 2018.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-04-03 12:45:53 | Re: GUC for temporarily disabling event triggers |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2023-04-03 12:33:28 | Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound |