Re: TODO updates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO updates
Date: 2000-07-23 16:36:25
Message-ID: 11981.964370185@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> As of the latest pg_dump, it dumps in modified oid order: rules, triggers,
> views and indexes always go at end, but the rest is in oid order.

Hmm, I think you need to dump views in OID order just as though they
were tables. What if an SQL function refers to a view?

Those other categories seem safe to handle this way, though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-23 17:18:39 Re: TODO updates
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2000-07-23 14:03:25 mac.c