From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Rudolf van der Leeden <vanderleeden(at)logicunited(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command |
Date: | 2007-11-21 16:42:46 |
Message-ID: | 1195663366.4246.47.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 11:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Perhaps we should move the successful archived message to DEBUG1 now,
> > except for the first message after the archiver starts or when the
> > archive_command changes, plus one message every 255 segments? That would
> > reduce the log volume in the normal case without endangering our ability
> > to see what is happening.
>
> That would confuse people terribly, and it *would* endanger our ability
> to see what was happening, 254 times out of 255.
That's my feeling too, just wanted to check it still made sense for
y'all.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-21 16:57:32 | Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-21 16:39:14 | Re: plperl failure on OS X 10.5(.1) |