Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rudolf van der Leeden <vanderleeden(at)logicunited(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command
Date: 2007-11-21 16:27:14
Message-ID: 11559.1195662434@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Perhaps we should move the successful archived message to DEBUG1 now,
> except for the first message after the archiver starts or when the
> archive_command changes, plus one message every 255 segments? That would
> reduce the log volume in the normal case without endangering our ability
> to see what is happening.

That would confuse people terribly, and it *would* endanger our ability
to see what was happening, 254 times out of 255.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matteo Beccati 2007-11-21 16:30:37 Re: Better default_statistics_target
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2007-11-21 16:18:35 Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command