Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?

Apologies, try this link instead:

http://miami.int.gu.edu.au/dbs/7016/a85397/state27a.htm#2067717

The previous one required you to be signed with technet - the one above
should be viewable by all.

John

John Sidney-Woollett said:
> I agree with most of this sentiment. Even knowing SQL and RDBMs reasonably
> well, there is still a significant effort involved in moving from another
> RDBMS (in my case Oracle) to postgres.
>
> The postgres docs provide much all the detail (in a very concise form).
> The hard part is putting all the different pieces together to solve some
> problem. In fact, this is where the postgres users list is so good,
> because the support and feedback from it is excellent.
>
> Contrast this page from the docs (for the update statement),
> http://www.postgres.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-update.html with
> Oracle's (for 8.1.7)
> http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/A87860_01/doc/server.817/a85397/state27a.htm#2067717
>
> Some might feel that much of the information is redundant or bloat. I
> disagree - you get a feel for what is possible as well as links to other
> commands, subtopics, and concept explanations.
>
> Someone commented that maintaining docs (of this sort) would be too hard -
> I disagree. Many of the commands are *mostly* implementation agnostic, and
> the initial docs would require siginificant effort to build, but should
> only require moderate maintenance as features are added or modified.
>
> Just my two cents (again).
>
> John Sidney-Woollett
>
> ps And yes, I would be willing to help once my current project is
> complete...
>
> Tony said:
>> By that logic then, we can probably ditch the PG Tutorial altogether and
>> provide a quick ref card of PG commands and keywords, with a few pages
>> on how PG is different should be plenty.
>>
>> The bisggest problem that I faced when moving to PG was the complete
>> lack of any cetralised information source for this information. Sure
>> there are tutorials on the web, first track them down, then convert
>> their use to PG then collate them, then make some sense of it all.
>> This is the kind of aloofness that I have mentioned previously, just
>> because it doesn't belong, doesn't mean it's not needed, and it only
>> needs to be written once. Although I know some of the concepts and I'm
>> beginning to grock them, I'm still trying to collate enough to satisfy
>> my needs.
>>
>> Assuming yo *do* want to grow the PG community and attract people from
>> other systems, the easier the transition for them, the less likely they
>> are to look elsewhere for something that appears easier. Easier
>> doesn't always mean easier to use, sometimes it can mean easier to get
>> to grips with.
>>
>> T.
>>
>> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>>
>>>For one thing, these thing do not belong to postgresql documentation.
>>>
>>>But I don't believe there is shortage of material on these topics on web
>>> and
>>>in print.
>>>
>>>However if you are refering to explaining these things, w.r.t.
>>> postgresql, I
>>>would be more than happy to churn out some extremely basic tutorials.
>>>
>>>Can you tell us what all you need? Rephrasing, if you know these(and
>>> some
>>>other) concpets by now, what all you missed while learning postgresql?
>>>
>>>It may sound like stupid question but unlearning things out of
>>> imagination is
>>>not easy...:-)
>>>
>>> Shridhar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>