Re: Cafeconf 2007

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cafeconf 2007
Date: 2007-09-28 17:53:15
Message-ID: 1191001995.4174.25.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 13:10 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:

> -The MySQL InnoDB implementation is mathematically serializable, where as
> the Postgres one isn't, so in that particular case they actually implement
> more strict transaction semantics.

Some evidence of what you say would go down nicely.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-09-28 17:53:22 Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-09-28 17:26:31 Re: Using Postgres as an alias