| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Features list |
| Date: | 2007-08-13 17:06:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1187024797.4133.4.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 13:32 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2007 07:47, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:22:40PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > I was reading the recent Slashdot thread on MySQL earlier and once again
> > > saw a number of people saying they would use PostgreSQL except for the
> > > lack of replication. This seems to me to be the widespread FUD about
> > > postgres these days.
> > >
>
> Do you really think people dont know postgresql has replication? I find it
> more that the general use of the term replication implies a built in
> solution, which we do not have.
Every time I attend a trade show this is the #1 question:
"Do you have replication?"
We need to bear in mind that non-supporters of PostgreSQL are fairly
vocal about the "fact" that we "dont support replication".
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-08-13 17:20:02 | Re: L |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-08-13 16:53:33 | Re: Change to community logins |