| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug |
| Date: | 2018-02-12 20:06:18 |
| Message-ID: | 11847.1518465978@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2/11/18 01:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. I was under the impression that Peter was looking into that ...
>> [ digs... ] see
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/80ee1f5c-fa9d-7285-ed07-cff53d4f4858@2ndquadrant.com
> Yeah that's still pending, but there wasn't a whole lot of reaction in
> that thread.
I think it's probably a good idea, but you hadn't finished the client
end of the patch. Since the main argument against doing this would
probably be about client-side breakage, we need to see how big that
impact will be before we make a final decision.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-12 20:09:27 | Re: Removing shm_mq.c's volatile qualifiers |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-12 20:00:54 | Re: Parallel bt build crashes when DSM_NONE |