Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hacking on PostgreSQL via GIT
Date: 2007-04-16 23:03:10
Message-ID: 11829.1176764590@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> writes:
> Would anyone know if these were "hand moved" to Attic?

Seems unlikely, since there's a commit log entry for the removal. But
this all happened seven-plus years ago and I'm sure there's an old CVS
bug involved *somewhere*.

I like the idea of re-adding and then re-removing the files on HEAD.
Does anyone think that poses any real risk?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-16 23:15:44 Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-04-16 23:01:04 Re: [HACKERS] choose_bitmap_and again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strangely Variable Query Performance)