From: | g(dot)hintermayer(at)inode(dot)at |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Apparent Wraparound? |
Date: | 2007-06-13 12:35:51 |
Message-ID: | 1181738151.663659.258770@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jun 8, 3:23 pm, alvhe(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)commandprompt(dot)com (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
> Gunther Mayer wrote:
> > Hi there,
>
> > I just found the following message in my logs:
>
> > Jun 8 10:38:38 caligula postgres[56868]: [1-1] : LOG: could not
> > truncate directory "pg_subtrans": apparent wraparound
>
> > Should I be worried or can I just ignore this one? My database is still
> > small (a pg_dumpall bzippe'd is still around 500KB) so I doubt that I'm
> > affected by any transaction id wraparound problems. I also vacuum
> > analyze once a day and have pg_autovacuum turned on.
>
> What version are you running? This seems to match the description of a
> bug fixed for 8.2 and 8.1.5:
>
I noticed the same message in my logfiles (once on each of two
servers). I'm running 8.1.8, and the server's been running flawless
for about 2 months.
Gerhard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-06-13 12:55:13 | Re: [SQL] setof or array as input parameter to postgresql 8.2 functions |
Previous Message | Gabriele | 2007-06-13 12:08:59 | Re: PostGreSQL for a small Desktop Application |