Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection

From: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: uol(at)freenet(dot)de
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection
Date: 2006-05-30 18:10:57
Message-ID: 1174. (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
uol(at)freenet(dot)de said:
> The patch was now hanging around more than 9 months,
> and it was already accepted during the
> original discussion by Neil Conway.

Nonsense. I provided some specific code cleanup suggestions and said that
I "didn't object to the general feature". That should not be taken as an
endorsement of everything that I didn't specifically comment on.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-05-30 18:12:04
Subject: Re: anoncvs still slow
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-05-30 18:04:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Schema Limitations ?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-30 20:14:09
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Round 2: Magic block for modules
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-05-30 16:41:39
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group