| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS |
| Date: | 2006-05-30 16:41:39 |
| Message-ID: | 447C75C3.5000609@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, Red Hat's legal department thinks that the FSF has "overreached"
> in claiming that the GPL is incompatible with OpenSSL's license. Which
> is why Red Hat isn't worrying about GPL apps that use OpenSSL, of which
> there are quite a few ...
>
>
I'm quite happy if we hang onto Red Hat's coat tails on this one.
Do we use any GPL libraries other than libreadline? It would be nice to
be able to get out of this game altogether - getting libedit up to
scratch and portable would be very nice, and I know for a fact that
commercial postgres vendors would welcome such a development.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-05-30 18:10:57 | Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection |
| Previous Message | uol | 2006-05-30 15:23:42 | Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection |