Re: An Idea for OID conflicts

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: An Idea for OID conflicts
Date: 2006-09-18 20:28:06
Message-ID: 1158611286.5274.16.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 14:10 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> My idea was to have a file called reserved_oids.h which would contain
> lines like:
>
> #error "do not include this file anywhere"
> CATALOG(reserved_for_foo_module,9876) /* 2006-09-18 */
>
> and which would be examined by the unused_oids script.

Or you needn't even use a header file -- presumably it wouldn't actually
be included by any C source files, so you could just keep the reserved
OIDs as a newline-separated text file. We'd probably want to design the
file format to avoid unnecessary patch conflicts when reserved OID
ranges are removed.

I wonder if the additional committer burden of maintaining this file is
worth it -- personally this problem rarely occurs in practice for me,
and when it does, it is easily resolved via the existing scripts for
finding duplicate and unused OIDs.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-09-18 20:30:10 Re: 8.2 beta blockers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-18 20:23:41 Re: An Idea for OID conflicts