Re: Inserts optimization?

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?
Date: 2006-04-14 20:15:33
Message-ID: 1145045732.23538.86.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 15:09, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Michael Stone writes:
>
> > I still don't follow that. Why would the RAID level matter? IOW, are you
> > actually wanting 2 spares, or are you just stick with that because you
> > need a factor of two disks for your mirrors?
>
> RAID 10 needs pairs.. so we can either have no spares or 2 spares.

Spares are placed in service one at a time. You don't need 2 spares for
RAID 10, trust me.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2006-04-14 20:27:59 Re: Inserts optimization?
Previous Message Francisco Reyes 2006-04-14 20:09:18 Re: Inserts optimization?