Re: 2 forks for md5?

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2 forks for md5?
Date: 2005-09-22 22:13:28
Message-ID: 1141.24.211.165.134.1127427208.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane said:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I turned on passwords and did see duplicate connections:
>
>> LOG: connection received: host=[local]
>> LOG: connection received: host=[local]
>> LOG: connection authorized: user=postgres database=test
>> LOG: disconnection: session time: 0:00:00.61 user=postgres
>> database=test host=[local]
>

>
> One answer is to downgrade the "connection received" to a DEBUGn
> message, so that it's only seen by those who presumably have something
> of a clue. I don't really care for this, but you could certainly argue
> that the other messages are sufficient for normal purposes.

Why not INFO?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-09-22 22:18:35 Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-09-22 22:12:32 Re: PCTFree Results