Re: DBlink documentation

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Andre Truter <linux(at)trusoft(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, Leonel Nunez <lnunez(at)enelserver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DBlink documentation
Date: 2005-12-17 16:09:16
Message-ID: 1134835756.4975.183.camel@Andrea.peacock.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general

Am Samstag, den 17.12.2005, 16:53 +0200 schrieb Andre Truter:
...
> Thanks, I'll download the Posgres source then.
>
> I would be nice if the documentation could be online though, then I
> would not need to download the whole postgres source just to get the
> documentation for one small part.

This is understandable ;) But in this case not postgres peoples
fault. There is no reason a package manager should exclude parts
of the software at will. The complete software includes all you need.
Well done packages either have a big package of all or single packages
you install which include the documentation too.
If someone does not use a package, (s)he is downloading the source
anyway to get postgres :-)

Regards
Tino

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andre Truter 2005-12-17 18:02:04 Re: DBlink documentation
Previous Message Andre Truter 2005-12-17 16:03:21 Re: DBlink documentation

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harry Jackson 2005-12-17 16:31:15 Re: outdated (bad) information in pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Andre Truter 2005-12-17 16:03:21 Re: DBlink documentation