|From:||Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Vacuum summary?|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 12:38 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> >>What do you guys think of having a vacuum summary command? E.g.;
> >>VACUUM [FULL] [ANALYZE] SUMMARY
> > ... that will turn SUMMARY into a fully reserved word ...
> Hmmm... good point. Other options would be:
> nutshell ;)
> report -- This one is interesting although sufffers from the same problem.
Good idea. I think its a good idea to make that info easily accessible.
How about putting this in the logfile, without any command changes?
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
|Next Message||Hannu Krosing||2005-07-12 06:53:11||CONCURRENT INDEXing again (was: Must be owner to truncate?)|
|Previous Message||Bruce Momjian||2005-07-12 03:29:20||Re: thousands comma numeric formatting in psql|