Re: Shortcut for defining triggers

Ühel kenal päeval (pühapäev, 23. jaanuar 2005, 15:49-0600), kirjutas Jim
C. Nasby:
> Sorry if this is old, but I couldn't find it in the archives...
>
> How difficult would it be to provide a means to define a trigger in one
> statement? Something like a combination of CREATE TRIGGER and CREATE
> FUNCTION? Being able to define them seperately is awesome for generic
> cases where you can use one function for a bunch of different tables,
> but it's a pain in the cases where you need a unique trigger for one
> table.

The same is true for the need to define RETURN TYPE of a function
separately from the function.

So: How difficult would it be to provide a means to define a function
and its return type in one statement?

--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>