Re: Difficulty modelling sales taxes

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, Frank Millman <frank(at)chagford(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Difficulty modelling sales taxes
Date: 2017-01-02 14:58:59
Message-ID: 10bff33b-60ba-dfa9-f1da-da19456fa2d8@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/02/2017 06:38 AM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Frank Millman <frank(at)chagford(dot)com
> <mailto:frank(at)chagford(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> *From:* amul sul
> *Sent:* Monday, January 02, 2017 12:42 PM
> *To:* Frank Millman
> *Cc:* pgsql-general
> *Subject:* Re: [GENERAL] Difficulty modelling sales taxes
>
> > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Frank Millman <frank(at)chagford(dot)com
> <mailto:frank(at)chagford(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> >
> >
> > It is a bit ugly, because I have to use the ‘NVARCHAR code’ column from
> >
> > tax_codes, not the primary key, but I think it would work.
> >
> >
> >
> NVARCHAR ? Are you using PostgreSQL as database server?
> >
>
>
> Oops, sorry.
>
> I am testing with PostgreSQL and with SQL Server, so I was in the
> wrong mindset when I posted.
>
> I should have said VARCHAR.
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
> *First, there is no need to make row_id's when you already have a valid
> primary key.

In a perfect world yes, but this is a world with ORM's as I found out
the hard way:

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/ref/models/fields/#primary-key

"The primary key field is read-only. If you change the value of the
primary key on an existing object and then save it, a new object will be
created alongside the old one."

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfredo Palhares 2017-01-02 15:20:44 Cannot recover from backup on barman
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2017-01-02 14:48:42 Re: COPY: row is too big