Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures)
Date: 2018-02-26 18:51:59
Message-ID: 1099d2c0-ebaa-5bf5-af91-5688da252367@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/24/18 14:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> I took a quick look through this and noted a few small problems; the
> only one worth mentioning here is that you've broken psql tab completion
> for functions and aggregates when talking to a pre-v11 server.
> I don't think that's acceptable; however, since tab-complete.c has no
> existing provisions for adjusting its queries based on server version,
> it's not really clear what to do to fix it. I'm sure that's soluble
> (and I think I recall a recent thread bumping up against the same
> problem for another change), but it needs a bit more sweat.

The patches proposed in the thread "PATCH: psql tab completion for
SELECT" appear to add support for version-dependent tab completion, so
this could be resolved "later".

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-02-26 18:55:25 Re: Precision loss casting float to numeric
Previous Message David Steele 2018-02-26 18:51:01 2018-03 CFM