Re: State of Beta 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com>
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-12 14:37:20
Message-ID: 10980.1063377440@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:25:53 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> wrote:
>> "int8col = 42" isn't indexable. [...] --- maybe
>> just taking out the int8-vs-int4 comparison operators would improve
>> matters. I might be willing to advocate another initdb to do that,

> You mean
> DELETE FROM pg_operator WHERE oid in (15, 36, 416, 417);
> and possibly some more oids? Does this really require an initdb?

I think so. Consider for instance stored views that contain references
to those operators. In any case, I don't really want to have to ask
people who complain about 7.4 performance problems whether they've done
the above.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-12 14:57:36 Re: selecting random rows
Previous Message Network Administrator 2003-09-12 14:27:39 Re: Picture with Postgres and Delphi