| From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2004-07-21 15:56:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1090425380.21450.26.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 11:33, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > Guys who would contact Geoff Davidson about PostgreSQL (sorry Geoff)
> > know so little about us that it is not even worth the paper it is
> > printed on.
>
> Based on what do you jump to the conclusion that he "knows so little about
> us"? Geoff, surprisingly enough, has a mindset of (to my chagrin at
I think the problem isn't Geoff, but the Aberdeen Group. The article was
poorly written and to make it look like Geoff may have been quoting
Aberdeen's report, which said we don't support row locking (FOR UPDATE
anyone?)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-21 16:02:24 | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-07-21 15:33:32 | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL |