Re: virtual fields on VIEW?

From: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net>
To: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: "raptor" <raptor(at)tvskat(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: virtual fields on VIEW?
Date: 2004-06-21 22:34:44
Message-ID: 1087857283.1187.938.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 13:34, Richard Huxton wrote:
> raptor wrote:
> >
> > ]- re: to myself... In fact I was using postgres in the past afaik
> > 6.x versions or so (no outer joins, rule system was still not fully
> > working ... it was good on paper was good but, ... now glad it has
> > advanced so much :")).. then i got using Inter Base(FireBird).
> > (really cool db :") ) From what I see 7.x series has made huge step
> > forward.. probably now surpacing firebird on features side.. (they
> > had hard time adapting Interbase code) (no flame pls!)
>
> Firebird is the only viable open-source alternative to PG that I can
> think of (which has been a viable project for any length of time).
>
> > AFAIK firebird(interbase) and postgres are the only DB with
> > multiversioning engines, is that true ?
>
> I think Oracle has its version.

According to the author of them, innodb tables under MySQL use MVCC as
well. Now if someone could just fix the parser in MySQL to not be
broken...

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike G 2004-06-22 00:50:38 Re: PGSQL service dieing...
Previous Message NTPT 2004-06-21 22:30:37 Re: Relocation error pg_dumpall undefined symbol get_progname in 7.4.3