| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, HORNYAK Laszlo <hornyakl(at)inf(dot)elte(dot)hu> |
| Subject: | Re: Pl/Java - next step? |
| Date: | 2004-02-22 18:07:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1077473268.1642.252.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Not to minimize your work, as I think it is great, but this particular
use-case I consider to be overkill for pl/java. It is probably easier to
use pl/pgsql if all you want to do is calculations.
We had suggested an online chat to discuss this, when would you be
available for that? What timezone are you in. Laszlo is in hungary, and
I am in canada, so we are likely spread allover the the map .
Dave
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 12:28, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > 1) Using JNI, you probably still want to communicate with another
> > running java process.
>
> B.T.W. I don't really agree on "probably". There are numerous cases when you
> will be happy just communicating with the database, communicate with another
> remote resource (message queue typically), or not communicate at all
> (calculations, etc.).
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-02-22 18:17:23 | Re: pl/perl thoughts |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-02-22 17:28:12 | Re: Pl/Java - next step? |