Re: Open 7.3 items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Date: 2002-08-27 21:44:41
Message-ID: 10746.1030484681@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> So it seems to me that you have achieved a small footprint within the
> code, but potentially at the cost of a larger impact on users.

I don't think anyone will deny that this is a kluge. However, we are
not going to resurrect the separate-password-file thing (that was a
worse kluge, especially when used for this purpose), and we are not
going to postpone 7.3 while we think about a nicer solution. So, simple
is beautiful for now. If there are enough people actually *using* this
feature to make it worth improving, we can improve it ... later.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 21:46:38 Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-08-27 21:36:36 Re: Open 7.3 items