| From: | Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: software vs hw hard on linux |
| Date: | 2003-09-14 05:40:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1063518020.27300.30.camel@blackbox |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 07:34, Jeff wrote:
> What I'm wondering about is what folks experience with software raid vs
> hardware raid on linux is. A friend of mine ran a set of benchmarks at
> work and found sw raid was running obscenely faster than the mylex and
> (some other brand that isn't 3ware) raids..
I ended up going with a hybrid: RAID-1 across sets of two disks in
hardware on Adaptec ZCR cards, and RAID-0 across the RAID-1s with Linux
software RAID.
Although the ZCR (2010 I believe) supports 0+1, using software striping
turned in better performance for me.
This way, I get brain dead simple dead disk replacement handled by
hardware with some speed from software RAID.
Also, I would think mirroring on the SCSI controller should take traffic
off the PCI bus... <shrug>
I have another machine that's stuck using a Compaq 5i plus controller
with no battery backed write cache, in RAID 5. It sucks. Really bad. I'd
rather use an IDE drive. :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-09-15 07:42:28 | Re: Attempt at work around of int4 query won't touch int8 index ... |
| Previous Message | Cott Lang | 2003-09-14 04:44:48 | Re: best arrangement of 3 disks for (insert) performance |