Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> If we're going to change it I think we need an updated patch that covers
> pg_dump. (Even if we argue that pg_dump would not normally dump this
> variable, keeping it up to date with respect to GUC_LIST_QUOTE seems
> proper.)
Right, I was definitely assuming that that would happen.
regards, tom lane