Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Postgresql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
Date: 2008-02-18 20:13:15
Message-ID: 104.1203365595@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> as the wishlist for PostgreSQL 8.4 still has my
> IDENTITY/GENERATED patches, I thought I refresh it.
> Before actually doing it though, I wanted to ask for opinions
> on implementation and ideas.

IIRC the end conclusion on that patch was that it was awfully messy,
didn't really buy much in new functionality, and was trying to track a
portion of the spec that the SQL committee had apparently not gotten
right yet.

> It seems the last draft for SQL:2008 largely clarified details for
> IDENTITY columns that were either conflicting or unclear in SQL:2003.

Implementing stuff that's still changing in a *draft* standard seems
to me like a good way to get burnt.

I think this needs to stay on the back burner, at least until there's
a published final spec that doesn't seem as broken as 2003 was. I
was sufficiently disillusioned with the whole thing at the end of
the previous review cycle
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00441.php
that I'm not really eager to pour more time down the same hole.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2008-02-18 20:16:38 Re: Ad Hoc Indexes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-02-18 20:09:34 Re: Ad Hoc Indexes