Re: Proposed GUC Variable

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Date: 2002-08-27 22:39:48
Message-ID: 1030487989.66579.2.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > A settable trim length would probably be a good idea, I suppose, for
> > those slinging 'bytea' and toasted texts around.
> Yes, but the default should be NO TRIM or in 1K-4K range. IMHO

Ditto.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-08-27 22:52:57 Re: C vs. C++ contributions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 22:34:40 Re: Proposed GUC Variable

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-08-27 23:00:25 Re: fix for palloc() of user-supplied length
Previous Message Nigel J. Andrews 2002-08-27 22:38:20 Superuser Reserved Backend Slots - TODO item