| From: | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
| Date: | 2002-07-30 08:19:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1028017179.12616.8.camel@atlas |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 18:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Curt Sampson wrote:
> > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance
> > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even started
> > to come up with anything.
>
> We inherited inheritance from Berkeley. I doubt we would have added it
> ourselves. It causes too much complexity in other parts of the system.
How about dropping it, then?
Just start to emit
WARNING: inheritance will be dropped with postgres 8.0
WARNING: please refer to http://.../ for an explanation why.
right now on every CREATE TABLE that uses it.
cheers
-- vbi
--
secure email with gpg http://fortytwo.ch/gpg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-30 08:45:43 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-07-30 08:13:24 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |