From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2002-07-30 08:13:24 |
Message-ID: | 1028016804.2875.19.camel@rh72.home.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:51, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> Bruce Momjian:
> > It causes too much complexity in other parts of the system.
>
> That's one reason.
Seems like somewhat valid reason. But still not enough to do a lot of
work _and_ annoy a lot of existing users :)
> Curt Sampson wrote:
> > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance
> > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even started
> > to come up with anything. and
> > there is nothing whatsoever that table inheritance does that the
> > relational model does not handle
>
> That's the other one.
That's quite bogus imho. You could just as well argue that there is
nothing that relational model handles that can't be done in pure C.
----------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder | 2002-07-30 08:19:39 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-07-30 07:49:52 | Re: Password sub-process ... |