From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context? |
Date: | 2023-05-19 15:28:25 |
Message-ID: | 102634.1684510105@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I didn't push 0001, I don't think generally do separate pgindent patches
> like this (I only run pgindent on large patches to ensure it doesn't
> cause massive breakage, not separately like this, but YMMV).
It's especially pointless when the main pgindent run for v16 is going
to happen today (as soon as I get done clearing out my other queue
items).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitry Markman | 2023-05-19 15:33:04 | Re: How to ensure that SSPI support (Windows) enabled? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-19 15:26:45 | Re: How to ensure that SSPI support (Windows) enabled? |