| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Broken SSL tests in master |
| Date: | 2016-12-01 19:56:01 |
| Message-ID: | 10222.1480622161@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Well, if people are unwilling to add test suites to 'make
> check-world', we can add 'make check-universe' and I'll run that
> instead. And that can come with a big shiny disclaimer. I just want
> a way to compile and run EVERYTHING that people care about not
> breaking, which I think is frankly a pretty reasonable request!
Really? How are you going to test Windows-specific (or any-other-
platform-but-yours-specific) code? How about WORDS_BIGENDIAN code,
or code that is sensitive to alignment rules? Or code that breaks
in locales you haven't got, or depends on compile options you don't
use?
check-world isn't a magic bullet.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-01 20:17:34 | Re: Broken SSL tests in master |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-01 19:50:28 | Re: Broken SSL tests in master |