|From:||David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>|
|To:||Pritam Baral <pritam(at)pritambaral(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>|
|Subject:||Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 3/17/17 5:41 PM, Pritam Baral wrote:
> So sorry. I'm attaching the correct version of the original with this,
> in case you want to test the limited implementation, because I still
> have to go through Tom's list of suggestions.
> BTW, the patch is for applying on top of REL9_6_2, and while I
> suspect it may work on master too, I haven't tested it since the
> original submission (Feb 23).
>> Also, I noticed that patch haven't regression tests. Some mention of
>> this optimization in docs is also nice to have. > > ------ >
>> Alexander Korotkov > Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
>> > The Russian Postgres Company
This thread has been idle for a week. Please respond and/or post a new
patch by 2017-03-28 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked
"Returned with Feedback".
|Next Message||Marko Tiikkaja||2017-03-24 15:04:51||Logical replication SnapBuildInitalSnapshot spelling|
|Previous Message||Petr Jelinek||2017-03-24 14:49:24||Re: logical replication apply to run with sync commit off by default|