| From: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Salma Elsayed <salmasayed182003(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PoC: Simplify recovery after dropping a table by LOGGING the restore LSN |
| Date: | 2026-10-21 13:50:28 |
| Message-ID: | 0c045d37-784f-495a-8f1a-24dab92cb18a@uni-muenster.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/21/26 2:49 PM, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> Having worked on the original patch, our goal was protecting the
> table data.
> The attempt to add DROP DATABASE "seemed" like it could come along for
> the ride,
> but it is clearly a different beast, for the reasons you describe.
+1
I agree that leaving drop database for another patch is a good idea.
Having it would be quite nice, bit it's indeed much harder than we
anticipated, so I guess it's ok to postpone it.
Best, Jim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Jones | 2026-10-21 14:03:45 | Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize |
| Previous Message | Mario González | 2026-10-21 13:35:39 | Re: pg_get_*_ddl() needs a redesign |