From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: commitfest 2018-07 |
Date: | 2018-06-06 16:40:40 |
Message-ID: | 0b0c15a7-a1af-2e24-9561-70401974e296@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/06/2018 11:57 AM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
>> On Jun 5, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Jonathan S. Katz
>> <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com
>> <mailto:jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 5, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
>>> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz <mailto:michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>>
>>> writes:
>>>> Okay. If we tend toward this direction, I propose to do this switch in
>>>> two days my time (Thursday afternoon in Tokyo) if there are no
>>>> objections, so as anybody has hopefully time to argue back.
>>>
>>> I think we probably have to wait longer. It's not clear to me when the
>>> RMT will decide that the 07 fest is go or no-go, but surely they've
>>> not decided yet.
>>
>> The RMT has its every-other-week catchup planned for tomorrow,
>> and we will discuss if we see any obstacles then and report back
>> posthaste.
>
> Reporting back from the RMT meeting, the final decision on this has
> not yet
> been made, but here is some guidance:
>
> - The main focus of the RMT is ensuring that PostgreSQL 11 is as stable
> as possible and we encourage the community to continue working on the
> open items[1] and ensuring this list is small.
>
> - We do need someone to volunteer for CFM (and for anyone new,
> CFM means "commitfest manager” :-) because without a CFM there is
> no commitfest.
>
> - Per discussions at the developer meeting, we do encourage the CFM
> to perform some initial triage to try to move larger patches to 2018-09 CF
> so that way we are not distracted while polishing and stabilizing the 11
> release.
>
> With the usual exception for forward looking statements, based on the
> current open items we do not anticipate anything delaying the start of the
> 2018-07 CF, unless something really bad comes up, but let’s ensure we
> have someone who is ready to lead the CF effort and we continue
> solving the open issues.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> [1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_11_Open_Items
I'll volunteer for CFM, which seems appropriate since I was one of the
supporters of having an extra CF.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-06 16:49:25 | Re: Supporting tls-server-end-point as SCRAM channel binding for OpenSSL 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 |
Previous Message | MauMau | 2018-06-06 16:37:56 | Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon |