Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2009-01-08 19:15:26
Message-ID: 0E1ED170-E65D-4C66-B99F-3F1DC99D032D@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Jan 8, 2009, at 13:56 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> There is interest in ReST for anyone doing a lot more than Python or
> Trac. Although that area is certainly strong with it. It is quickly
> becoming one of the more dominant technologies in delivering web
> services (now whether or not that is useful here is another argument).

I think there may be confusion here betwixt ReST/RST and REST.

REST: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer
ReST/RST: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReStructuredText

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2009-01-08 19:31:13 Re: [BUGS] BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-08 19:09:05 Re: Hot standby, slot ids and stuff