| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Timeout parameters |
| Date: | 2019-04-05 07:34:48 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBF01D3@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz]
> The first letter should be upper-case.
Thank you for taking care of this patch, and sorry to cause you trouble to fix that...
> to me that socket_timeout_v14.patch should be rejected as it could cause
> a connection to go down with no actual reason and that the server should
> be in charge of handling timeouts. Is my impression right?
No, the connection goes down for a good reason that the client could not get the response within a tolerable amount of time.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Banck | 2019-04-05 07:41:58 | Re: pg_rewind vs superuser |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-04-05 07:10:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |