Re: Statement-level rollback

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Simon Riggs' <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Statement-level rollback
Date: 2017-11-06 00:36:16
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F810A6B@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Simon Riggs
> A backend-based solution is required for PL procedures and functions.
>
> We could put this as an option into PL/pgSQL, but it seems like it is
> a function of the transaction manager rather than the driver.

Exactly. Thanks.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Brusselback 2017-11-06 01:00:14 Re: Custom compression methods
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-11-05 23:09:18 Re: Early locking option to parallel backup

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-11-06 09:23:27 Re: Statement-level rollback
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2017-11-03 16:59:30 Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?