From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Simon Riggs' <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Statement-level rollback |
Date: | 2017-11-06 00:36:16 |
Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F810A6B@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Simon Riggs
> A backend-based solution is required for PL procedures and functions.
>
> We could put this as an option into PL/pgSQL, but it seems like it is
> a function of the transaction manager rather than the driver.
Exactly. Thanks.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Brusselback | 2017-11-06 01:00:14 | Re: Custom compression methods |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-11-05 23:09:18 | Re: Early locking option to parallel backup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-11-06 09:23:27 | Re: Statement-level rollback |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2017-11-03 16:59:30 | Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10? |