| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off |
| Date: | 2016-08-05 10:25:45 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5BF090@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Yeah, I think I agree. It would be bad to disable it by default on Unix,
> because ps(1) is a very standard tool there, but the same argument doesn't
> hold for Windows.
It seems that we could reach a consensus. The patch is attached. I'll add this to the next CommitFest.
> Another route to a solution would be to find a cheaper way to update the
> process title on Windows ... has anyone looked for alternatives?
I couldn't find an alternative solution after asking some Windows support staff.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| update_process_title_off_on_win.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-08-05 10:29:01 | Re: PostgreSQL 10 Roadmaps |
| Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-08-05 09:43:04 | Re: Bogus ANALYZE results for an otherwise-unique column with many nulls |