Re: Make executor's Range Table an array instead of a List

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Make executor's Range Table an array instead of a List
Date: 2018-09-04 08:26:12
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/09/04 17:14, David Rowley wrote:
> On 4 September 2018 at 19:31, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> On 2018/08/24 7:22, David Rowley wrote:
>>> On 24 August 2018 at 02:26, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> One of the patches I sent last week does the same thing, among a
>>>> couple of other things with regard to handling relations in the
>>>> executor. On a cursory look at the patch, your take of it looks
>>>> better than mine. Will test tomorrow. Here is a link to my email:
>>>> 4th of my patches implements the array'fication of executor's range table.
>>> Sorry, didn't realise. I'll withdraw this and review yours during the
>>> upcoming 'fest.
>> Since your patch implemented the idea in a better manner, I'm thinking I
>> should merge it with mine. Is that okay with you?
> Feel free to do that.

Okay, will do.

> I've not yet looked at your patch. I was
> planning on looking at your partition planning performance
> improvements patches first.

Great, thanks.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-09-04 08:53:11 Re: executor relation handling
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-09-04 08:16:09 Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option)