From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
Date: | 2023-08-28 12:55:54 |
Message-ID: | 099f86fc-59e9-89f5-0791-a892075651dc@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25.08.23 13:38, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I have now pushed this again. Hopefully it'll stick this time.
>
> We may want to make some further tweaks to the behavior in some cases --
> for example, don't disallow ALTER TABLE DROP NOT NULL when the
> constraint is both inherited and has a local definition; the other
> option is to mark the constraint as no longer having a local definition.
> I left it the other way because that's what CHECK does; maybe we would
> like to change both at once.
>
> I ran it through CI, and the pg_upgrade test with a dump from 14's
> regression test database and everything worked well, but it's been a
> while since I tested the sepgsql part of it, so that might the first
> thing to explode.
It looks like we forgot about domain constraints? For example,
create domain testdomain as int not null;
should create a row in pg_constraint?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-08-28 13:00:05 | Re: proposal: psql: show current user in prompt |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-08-28 12:32:24 | Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc? |