| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marius Timmer <marius(dot)timmer(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |
| Date: | 2019-03-22 09:26:32 |
| Message-ID: | 0951afb4-a634-e047-4cd8-a9e98f7feed9@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-21 18:46, Marius Timmer wrote:
> as I mentioned three weeks ago the patch from October 2018 did not apply
> on the master. In the meantime I rebased it. Additionally I fixed some
> Makefiles because a few icu-libs were missing. Now this patch applies
> and compiles successfully on my machine. After installing running "make
> installcheck-world" results in some failures (for example "select"). I
> will take a closer look at those failures and review the whole patch in
> the next few days. I just wanted to avoid that you have to do the same
> rebasing stuff. The new patch is attached to this mail.
As I said previously in this thread, this patch needs some fundamental
design work. I don't think it's worth doing a code review on the patch
as it is.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rahila Syed | 2019-03-22 09:36:50 | Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-03-22 09:20:19 | Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions |