Re: Add bms_offset_members() function for bitshifting Bitmapsets

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add bms_offset_members() function for bitshifting Bitmapsets
Date: 2026-07-08 19:24:51
Message-ID: 08fa9f01-373e-4cb4-9650-ad20517e2de3@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20.04.26 01:52, David Rowley wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2026 at 07:22, Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me> wrote:
>> I applied, tested, and reviewed these changes. Thanks for doing this, only a few small things jumped out.
>
> Many thanks. I took all of those suggestions.
>
>> SELECT test_bms_offset_members('(b 1)', -2147483648);
>
> I made that one use member 0 instead of 1. That'll mean "new_highest"
> goes to INT_MIN rather than INT_MIN + 1.

In the function test_random_offset_operations(), the variable seed is
declared as type uint64, then assigned from GetCurrentTimestamp() or
PG_GETARG_INT64(), both of which return int64, then it is passed to
pg_prng_seed(), which takes uint64, and then it is printed using
INT64_FORMAT. Maybe this could be a bit more consistent?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2026-07-08 20:39:42 Hash index bucket split bug
Previous Message Haibo Yan 2026-07-08 19:24:22 [PATCH] ecpg: use memcpy in a few length-based copies