Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2020-07-15 22:18:26
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 15 Jul 2020, at 20:35, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/15/20 4:46 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> My plan is to keep hacking at this to have it reviewable for the 14 cycle, so
>> if anyone has an interest in NSS, then I would love to hear feedback on how it
>> works (and doesn't work).
> I'll be happy to help, particularly with Windows support and with some
> of the callback stuff I've had a hand in.

That would be fantastic, thanks! The password callback handling is still a
TODO so feel free to take a stab at that since you have a lot of context on

For Windows, I've include USE_NSS in as Thomas pointed out in this
thread, but that was done blind as I've done no testing on Windows yet.

cheers ./daniel

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-07-15 22:48:28 sys_siglist[] is causing us trouble again
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-15 22:16:26 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend